This is what you call a terrible testimony: “Hobby Lobby to forfeit ancient Iraqi artifacts in settlement with DOJ.”
From the article:
Federal prosecutors say that when Hobby Lobby, which is based in Oklahoma City, began assembling its collection it was warned by an expert on cultural property law to be cautious in acquiring artifacts from Iraq, which in some cases have been looted from archaeological sites.
Despite that warning and other red flags the company in December 2010 purchased thousands of items from a middle-man, without meeting the purported owner, according to prosecutors.
A dealer based in the United Arab Emirates shipped packages containing the artifacts to three Hobby Lobby corporate addresses in Oklahoma City, bearing false label that described their contents as “ceramic tiles” or “clay tiles” and the country of origin as Turkey.
Simply disgraceful and dishonest. Sure, lets lie and break the law so we can can fill out our Bible museum. I hope this goes viral and shames the whole lot of them.
It seems that most any company that claims to be Christian is not. They are front organizations for government agendas. I find it no coincidence that Iraq was Babylon and that those artifacts are very important to occultists, the whole brood of them.
“They are front organizations for government agendas.”
Not to defend Hobby Lobby, but got any proof of that sweeping assertion?
I find your comment to be extremely derogatory and probably even defamatory. What facts do you have concerning the individuals involved? I see none offered. Mr. Steve Green has addressed the events and circumstances involved. I, too, find the methods employed to be less than ideal, but to go from there to occultist involvement is a far stretch indeed. While we can and should condemn dishonest behavior we cannot an should not try to ascribe true motivation since we were not present and do not know the individuals involved well enough to even shape an informed opinion.
Why is Nlouis allowed to post a comment filled with shady assertions like “”They are front organizations for government agendas.”” while my simply asking them to prove those assertions has been pending for a least a week?