See the newest post over on PaleoBabble. I show you all where and how you can search for the term “Anunnaki” in Sumerian texts via Oxford’s website — in Sumerian — and then get the translations, courtesy of the Electronic Text Corpus of Sumerian Literature.
Another reason why Sitchin’s material is without merit and can safely be ignored.
just wondering if Sitchin followers are still giving you crap EVEN after your great videos/proof..
blessings
@rode: of course; had two this week.
As you MIGHT have noticed, I’m NOT a “Linguist” — or gifted in speaking languages, other than my own — English. And, to further complicate, I’m HORRIBLE at grammar & proper construction of text. So, that said:
Where in the ETCSL search response that you taught us to try, do I find the debunking of stichin’s contention that the A-nu-na Anunnaki, are E.T.’s or Aliens? Hmmmm…let me rephrase that “Q”:
Are you saying that, in Summerian Lit, their Gods, (the anunnaki?), are never described as E.T./s…or, as aliens? And if not, what then ARE they described as? (I’m not doubting…just too ignorant to be sure what the ETCSL results actually show). i.e., until you explained that the TR/ in the numbering code, stood for translation, I had no idea WHAT that code stood for…never done this before. Just beginning.
I’m of the understanding that the Anunnaki were the Sumerians’ Gods — which, I’d surmise, were supranatural beings of other dimensional realities. But, aren’t those what many today often term as “aliens”? And even E.T.’s?
As I write this I have that sinking feeling that you’re going tell me to go to the REAR of this class & put that pointed paper hat on…but, I hope I’m making a little sense…