My thanks are due to the generous policy of Tyndale Bulletin for allowing me to post a link to a scholarly article that appears in the most recent issue. The article is entitled:
Monotheism and the Language of Divine Plurality in the Hebrew Bible and the Dead Sea Scrolls
More chunky divine council goodness — this time including the Dead Sea Scrolls! Here’s the abstract:
Most Hebrew Bible scholars believe that Israelite religion evolved from polytheism to monotheism, an evolution in which the biblical writers participated. The dominant version of this consensus is that this religious evolution culminated by the end of the exile or shortly thereafter. A minority perspective places the evolutionary end point later. At issue is the presence of the language of divine plurality, positive references to other gods (אֱלֹהִים or אֵלִים) under YHWH’s authority, in Jewish religious texts composed during and after the Second Temple period. This article surveys the language of divine plurality in the Hebrew Bible and the sectarian literature at Qumran to show its conceptual continuity and longevity, and rejects the notion that it is incongruent with a belief in the uniqueness of YHWH.
I’m always directing readers and students to the scholarly journal literature, but that’s often kept out of reach by policy. Tyndale Bulletin is a welcome exception.
Thanks! Looking forward to reading it!
Sometimes saying thank you just doesn’t say enough regarding everything you provide for people to pursue. My intention is not to make you feel uncomfortable,so I hope you don’t. Nevertheless, an eternal thank you for everything!!
thanks – I don’t mind, though it’s uncomfortable in “real time” (and it beats the hate mail).
I enjoyed reading the article. I imagine that folks who themselves are monotheists would like to ignore the material you surveyed or sanitize it. There is a bit of material in the OT that troublesome, like the watchers/nephilim pericope. I think maybe that was included in the OT to discredit the theology (origination of evil) in the book of Enoch.
Well, I’m a monotheist, but my point is the way we talk about that isn’t adequate with respect to biblical terminology. In other words, it’s a mistake to use the term elohim to speak of monotheism or polytheism. We need to describe what the terms mean, not assume a modern use of them = what they mean.
The “Follow this topics” link tags are broken.
Those links are to get an RSS feed for similar posts.