More Evidence that So-Called Gospel of Jesus’ Wife was Forged

5 Comments

1. 

   max on August 29, 2015 at 7:31 am

   I’m assuming no image of the “GJW” exists.
   Probably written with a Sharpy on a grocery bag. (1)
   Best.

   1- [e.n.]21st C update of crayon/brown paper bag.

   • 

     MSH on August 30, 2015 at 7:16 pm

     funny – all that there is is the forged fragment.

2. 

   busterggi (Bob Jase) on August 31, 2015 at 12:20 pm

   Am I misunderstanding the article or are all the assessments being made using photocopies and transcriptions? If so, why not actually study/test the original?

   • 

     MSH on September 1, 2015 at 11:46 am

     Yes, you’re pretty late to the game (not intended to be pejorative there). The point is that the “original” was forged from various sources – someone obtained a fragment of ancient material and forged content onto it from known sources, splicing the items together to MAKE this text say what it says. For older posts on this that have more detail (with illustrations of how it was done), put these words into my site’s search field (upper right hand corner): Jesus wife gospel coptic.

     • 

       busterggi (Bob Jase) on September 1, 2015 at 11:57 am

       thanks!