The episode of Noah’s drunkenness in Genesis 9 has long befuddled interpreters. One of Noah’s sons, Ham, commits some heinous crime against his father. Oddly, though, Ham is not the one cursed by his father. Instead, Ham’s son Canaan bears the wrath of Noah. This episode explores the traditional solutions to the interpretive confusion and offers an alternative based on recent research in the Hebrew text.
The episode is now live.
Dr. Heiser I have a few questions / ideas I would like to run by you,
that popped into my head about this episode. For some reason I’m having
difficulty finding the newsletter e-mail to find the file you have
uploaded about the subject matter. I thought about the theory proposed
about the maternal incest and the argument behind it. The first thing
that came to mind was … As soon as Ham told his brothers about his
violation they responded by taking a garment and laid it over his
fathers nakedness. Although you referenced Leviticus, to me they are
laying a setting that Noah was already naked in the tent and then a
garment was placed over someone… logically it would appear to me that
it would be Noah since he is the only one referenced as being naked.
Also regardless of who was violated, what did laying the garment over
either his father or him accomplish? What exactly would this hide? How
would Noah know his wife was violated? We are also told that their
brothers did not see their fathers nakedness because they were turned
backwards. How would this be a word play about the Leviticus “seeing or
knowing” their mother or father?Next I would like to talk about the
inheritance part and the curse to Canaan. It tells us that Ham is his
youngest son. Isn’t it tradition for the oldest son gains inheritance?
So by having an illegitimate son how would that give him advantage?
There were not concubines or anything to really compete with one
another. I would like to propose one last thing… I believe we can
solve the hole in some theories about how did Noah know to curse Canaan
if this child was not born yet. But what if Canaan had already been
born, and conceived legitimately from Ham and his wife when Noah cursed
Canaan? What if he cursed his child because he was the first born and
knew that anything passed on from that point would flow through Canaan
and be a rotten seedand lineage. After all the land of Canaan was
ordered to be destroyed
and everyone in it. To me these flow easier.
我赚啦：什么不用干，收入无上限。免费下载营销软件！
①浏览赚钱。每浏览一个广告1分钱。下线每浏览一个广告你也有1分钱。(收入无限制)
②坐等收钱。逆向推荐，上线替下线发展，就算不推广，照样有钱赚。(每年最多赚44286元)
③推广赚钱。每推荐一个VIP下线提成 5 元，三三倍增，十级提成。(每年最多赚442860元)
④广告赚钱。你推荐的下线发布广告你都有其广告费 20% 的提成。(收入无限制)
营销软件，网赚揭秘，免费下载，永久更新！
注册网址：
http://www.wozhuan.la/?ic=cool
无上线无法注册，请勿删除后缀！
Yes. The curse upon Cain and Ham and Cainan no doubt involves defilement of the DNA/spirit and will of the spirit/seed within.
I can’t believe I woke up with this on my mind this morning, (don’t ask) and here it is! I feel blessed today, it’s been one of those stories with a 1000 interpretations, and I believe I shall find the truth tonight when I listen.