Everyone here knows I am no fan of Sitchin, but good grief – this announcement could at least spell the man’s name correctly.
Zecharia Sitchin Passes Away
6 Comments
Support Miqlat
Everyone here knows I am no fan of Sitchin, but good grief – this announcement could at least spell the man’s name correctly.
After reading some of your work/findings and Sitchin’s among other others I still can’t help but find that no proof, of what you bring or Sithcin’s and his followers believe bring, are any more believable than one another. Both leave lingering questions and interpretations that are debatable. So by dismissing anyone’s work without definitive proof of your own, isn’t that opening one’s self to bias?
Then you really don’t understand what you’re reading. I really can’t do any more than ask you to read what’s on the tablets, like when I search through the Sumerian texts for “Anunnaki” and read for yourself. What Sitchin says about the Anunnaki isn’t present in the tablets. If you can’t figure out that means he’s wrong, then I really can’t help you. I can’t make it any plainer or simpler or factual. You just *want* to believe him, no matter what.
I do not know whether it’s just me or if perhaps everybody else encountering issues with your blog. It seems like some of the text within your content are running off the screen. Can someone else please provide feedback and let me know if this is happening to them as well? This might be a problem with my browser because I’ve had this happen previously. Cheers
I’ll be interested to see if this recurs (thanks). I just updated to the latest version of WordPress (a few minutes ago), so maybe that will help.
I’m with Pete on this. I’m not a Sitchinite either, but neither side of the debate has definitive proof. Most of the claims of debunking that you’ve done on his work do not seem to carry the definitive proof required to show that Sitchin’s work is baseless. A few mistakes made by a researcher, however callous those mistakes may be, does not debunk all of the work that he has done. I’ve read a few of his books and have generally found enough information that supports his claims. I’m not suggesting that he was entirely 100% correct, however. Just that Sitchin provided far more that supported his theories than you have in debunking them and yours are kindof open to interpretation just as his are… I just don’t see enough data from your side of the debate to claim that Sitchin was a ‘hack’. Furthermore, the pH of your writing reveals a bit about how you may be motivated.
show me where Sitchin has *any* proof from actual tablet references.