Kind of . . . sort of . . . well, not really . . . maybe. Actually, it depends on what one wants to read into what’s said and isn’t.
I can hardly wait for the ancient astronaut crowd to think this means something. They are truly desperate for validation.
But let’s be honest. Let’s suppose that the people quoted in the Times are the smartest people on the planet. What does that mean for the Times‘ article? Nothing. Why? Because it is entirely opinion-based. In other words, the claims lack actual scientific data. There are no data that prove the people doing the opining aren’t doing more than reading our technological culture back into antiquity.
If you’ve followed ancient astronaut “research” for any amount of time you’ll note that isn’t unusual. It’s the norm.
But enjoy.
(Hat tip to Jason Colavito).
Did you see the Ancient Alien episode “The Satan Conspiracy” ? At the end of that episode, David Childress provides a clue that points to my conclusion about the Ancient Aliens series. Childress said, “in a sense, Satan’s not such a bad guy”. I think they’ve been dying to say that since the first episode of the first season. But they had to indoctrinate the initiates (the viewers) little by little one degree at a time.
Most of the episodes in every season show something that happened in history involving the fallen angels and their giant offspring. Yes, the true identity of most of the beings behind the sometimes “unexplainable” stuff is no other than the Benay ha-elohim and in some cases their hybrid offspring that were part supernatural and part human (e.g. Nephilim).
What i’m saying here might sound off the wall and out in left field all by my solo…however, go back to watch season one and season two…but this time, be conscious of every time they say “extraterrestrial” or “aliens” or what have you…and in your mind, immediately replace the word they use with the words “fallen angels”. Now the whole series makes a lot more sense and is so much more accurate in most cases.
Remember, there was a time in the ancient past where each and every nation (except Israel) had as king over it a benay ha-elohim (Deuteronomy 32:8). So what do you think that king did. Do you suppose he sat around eating grapes and being fanned. He went to work and taught his hybrid offspring many things and they built great cities and great walls and oh yeah, they easily moved megalithic stones that weighed over 100 tons. And oh yeah, they taught their hybrid offspring some secret magic arts. They taught them astrology/astronomy and etcetera. This is why all around the world you have things that are simmilar…because each benay ha-elohim that was king over each nation reported to Satan which unified much of their administration.
The archaeological evidence that they present as proof of ET’s is simply proof of non-humans which are the Benay ha-elohim (or in some cases Nephilim)
I would say what they uncover is evidence of human technology only, but I appreciate the other point – what Childress said. That’s a significant trajectory of Gnosticism, and anyone familiar with both Gnosticism and ancient alien theory knows that the latter is just the former re-cast in modern technological sci-fi garb.
I have always thought, the belittling of human innovation(by ancient aliens) quite concerning,why is no one saying genetic research has to be alien ‘influenced’. We all need to face the fact ,humans are extremely capable and were created that way on purpose.
There is a propaganda that; humans are insignificant, I would say that idea is completely insane.
India is a key to understanding history. Many people refuse that fact.Sanskrit is of Persian origin,and clearly the artifacts and inscriptions(found in Ayrian culturual sites)are of particular interest to, scholars of the Dunhuang cave libraries, would love to find the christian writings from those caves(there is said,a few may remain),and publicize them. I read Herodotus and he kinda eludes to the idea of gods morphing to political ideals, hence the Wak idea of muslim extremists calling them selves ,(I.S.I.S)
So Herodotus explains,that Greeks have morphed, Persian gods into their own gods,and Persians morphed the Egyptian gods into their own. Now one can see the pattern, and realize, their are powers influencing every part of every ones lives.
The “Times of India” and the “Hindustan Times” are almost as bad as the “Daily Mail” from England. I give any of those “newspapers” about as much credence as I gave Pravda during the Soviet years.
Sorry for the inappropriate quotes.
Jesse