This post points out a number of errors in the “spin” put out by the BBC with respect to Sinaiticus, which just went online. This is a follow-up to earlier error-prone reporting about Sinaiticus.
I hope this isn’t news (especially in the wake of the Jesus Tomb circus – or “archaeo-porn” as one blogger artfully called it), but the major media habitually gets this kind of thing wrong.
I was incredibly irritated by this particular article. Sometimes its amazing how wrong people can be!
@Mike: I hear you.
From reading the articles I get the feeling the BBC authors are not just incorrect; they are lying.
could be