Someone sent me the picture below (actually, this is a better one, taken from Google Earth – I got the original in Google maps – put in the coordinates yourself and have a look: 33.206278, -103.584820). Certain bloggers have duly claimed that the image is the result of Nazi occultism and perhaps alien connections to (again) Roswell, NM. Are they? Is there another explanation?
Those readers who know me and who have read my book, The Facade, know that I’m quite interested in Nazi occultism. As such, I’d sure love to say these images can be connected with that, but it ain’t so. There are actually two good explanations, but the second is the actual answer:
1. There is a clear swastika on the ground, but no connection to nazi occultism BECAUSE the swastika was a symbol in use by Native Americans in New Mexico and elsewhere in the southwest. See link 1, link 2, and link 3 in that regard (and it didn’t take long to find these):
The above is interesting, and coherent. But the real answer is likely . . .
2. These “Roswell glyphs” are actually military geoglyphs constructed in connection with WW II for precision bombing practice.
About a quarter way down in the above link you read this:
“The New Mexico figures were constructed as targets on precision bombing ranges attached to Army Air Corps training fields located at Albuquerque, Clovis, Deming, Carlsbad, Hobbes, and Roswell.”
The site even gives the coordinates of other bombing ranges in Roswell (see toward the bottom – the one noted on Google Earth/Maps is “PBR 14“).
Paper rolls… very great read you know alot about this topic i see!…
Thanks for ones marvelous posting! I certainly enjoyed reading it, you may be a great author.I will ensure that I bookmark your blog and definitely will come back very soon. I want to encourage yourself to continue your great writing, have a nice weekend!
thanks!
I don’t know if there was a true conspiracy but there surely were weird historical facts and true occult rituals in Nazi Germany. The most serious book on the subject is “Nazi Secrets” by Frank Lost on Amazon
There are several better books on this than this one (in terms of scholarly publishing – e.g., Goodrick-Clarke’s three books], which is where I do my own research). That said, I’m sure there’s some worthwhile content in your book. I just stay with peer-reviewed scholarship for such things. It would be a good idea when using someone else’s blog comments to promote your book to disguise your name. Otherwise, it looks tacky.