This is a follow-up to my earlier post in regard to the article on how folklore served as a useful propaganda tool in Nazi Germany. The article was meant to point out that governmental power, totalitarian or otherwise, often makes use of “big picture” ideas – BELIEFS – to serve its own end. History literally teems with examples. Frankly, the idea that religion / belief (coherent to us or not) fuels action, including control of other people, is about as close to a self-evident truth as you’re likely to encounter. An idea like Manifest Destiny in U.S. history is illustrative.
For the Nazis, their religio-mythical base was the Aryan mythology wedded to Germanic folklore. In the hands of Himmler and his ilk, this amounted an amalgam of Blavatsky’s root races mythology and other elements of theosophy, occult bloodline lore, eastern religion, and even ET as a progenitor of the human race. If you’re interested in all this and want to read scholarly material on it, I recommend Nicholas Goodrick-Clarke’s “trilogy” – the first volume of which is his Oxford doctoral dissertation (the ET/UFO connection is in ch. 8 of the third book):
1. The Occult Roots of Nazism: Secret Aryan Cults and Their Influence on Nazi Ideology
2. Hitler’s Priestess: Savitri Devi, the Hindu-Aryan Myth, and Neo-Nazism
3. Black Sun: Aryan Cults, Esoteric Nazism, and the Politics of Identity
For our purposes, I thought this article could serve as a springboard to how the ET mythology of the 20th century could serve various constituencies. Anyone who follows “exopolitics” knows that it’s already serving political ends. Let’s list a few that area already present, and some that might surface if there is an ET reality someday-or such a reality is contrived for the masses.
1. The radical political left-wingers – I’m thinking here of people like Alfred Webre and Steven Greer. ET is the answer to global warming and alternative energy. If something happened to sway the masses into believing ET contact had been made – or was genuinely on the horizon, people like Greer, who fancy themselves as some sort of avatar or liaison with ET (by arranging psychic meetings with them for a fee), would be in a position to demand real power and influence-effectively attaining that status. ET would be a political tool for all sorts of global change. Don’t believe me? Look at global warming (which I consider a myth in terms of human causation-and hence human solution-and thousands of scientists do as well, but are effectively silenced). Global warming is really about changing the global economy, redistributing the wealth of the West to the end of government ownership of industry (i.e. socialism and then communism), and keeping the Third World from developing. This is an old agenda, dating back to Marx and the Fabian society. If you want scholarship on this, I recommend the two academic works below:
My point here is that the global warming / climate change agenda has already been merged by some with the ET issue. That won’t change, and will gain momentum if ET becomes official (real or not).
2. The military industrial complex – This one’s easy and also already here (and has been for decades). If you’ve read The Façade, you know that one of my takes on the UFO issue is that the idea of alien craft visiting earth has been a useful lie since the events of Roswell. I was in print with this idea before Nick Redfern, but he’s the guy who’s put the most time into it. The alien crash myth was a carrot dangled before the public to cover up a PAPERCLIP screw-up at Roswell. The science fiction climate was just right for it, and it served as an unfalsifiable mythology that helped deflect attention away from the fact that Nazi and other war criminal scientists were on our payroll helping us fight the Cold War. I frankly wonder if mainstream science could ever come forth with an “ET is real” statement without getting the orders for doing so from the military. It’s a bit scary to think that the military really is in the position of “validating” ET for the scientific community (which wouldn’t be good science). What if there was a selfish, rogue element in our military that cared more for its own agenda than constitutional rule? All that would be needed is for the military to admit (even in private) that all that alien visitation and UFO crash stuff was real, but withheld from the public to avoid panic. The military industrial complex could bring about a new phase of the mythology to accelerate the weaponization of space. It really wouldn’t even need to be public. Admissions, advice, and demands could all be made behind the closed doors of Congress or the Oval Office. ET would be the ultimate enemy for the military to protect us from. Always formidable, always out there, always justifying the need for more. Again, all that’s needed is the BELIEF that ET is real. Just speculation for now, obviously. My point is only how the BELIEF could be used.
3. Radical Islam – Yes, you read correctly. Sound bizarre? Well, there isn’t much about radical Islam that’s very coherent, is there? Nevertheless, it is flourishing. This is in part because, as Muslims who have broken away from Islam (radical and otherwise) have told anyone who will listen, that 99% of Muslims know next to nothing about the contents of the Quran. They know only what their radicalizers tell them. Granted, there’s a lot of content in the Quran that fits their logic and agenda, but there’s also material that doesn’t. My point is that there is no intellectual wave of resistance within Islam against the radical fundamentalists in its ranks because most of the radicalized are ignorant. They are also kept in tow by fear. The educated radicals we read about from time to time typically buy it because they are taught to hate the West, as though Muslims could never be the source and solution for their own problems around the globe. Anyway-did you realize that the Quran allows for, and even suggests, that there is ET life?1 Moreover, the Quran can also read as having Adam created off planet earth by Allah from blood and clay and even a “sperm drop” – who is spoken of in the plural. (Sounds like Sitchin, doesn’t it?).2 I’m not suggesting that this is the correct way to read the Quran, only that it COULD be read this way – and I believe it WOULD be read that way in the wake of an ET revelation. It would be easy for radical Islam to claim that the discovery of real ET life and the relationship of humanity to our “space brothers” was anticipated only by the holy Quran, thereby validating its inspired status. I don’t think that would hurt Islam’s growth and power. Outside of the Al-Qaeda type, these ideas are already being popularized in the urban ghetto 3
4. The most scary group for my money is one that, to my knowledge, doesn’t exist yet in any unified, formalized, intentional body. This is the group that I’ll share some thoughts about in my next post.
Again, to be clear – none of this is about what’s real, only what could be believed, and how such beliefs could be used to manipulate. The ET myth could be a powerful tool to various ends.
- http://www.alislam.org/library/books/revelation/part_4_section_7.html ↩
- Surah 2:29-35; elsewhere (in hundreds of places) in the Quran, “We” is used when Allah speaks, even though “He” is used when Allah is spoken of by another. See Surah 17: 69-70; 86:5-7; 96:1-2; 30:25-33; 72:17-20. ↩
- See Yusuf Nuruddin, “Ancient black astronauts and extraterrestrial Jihads: Islamic science fiction as urban mythology,” Socialism & Democracy, Nov2006, Vol. 20 Issue 3, p127-165, 39pp. Abstract: The article discusses the Islamic science fiction motifs in urban mythology. Urban mythology is defined as narratives about supernatural characters and events of oppressed people in contemporary urban getto. It is emphasized that the science fiction in urban mythology speaks of transcendent powers, beings and realms and has its canon, conventions and protocols. ↩
Three points in response to this post.
1. We do not have any proof that the military and war-time scientists were involved in a secret test-flight at Roswell. We don’t have any proof that the military is right now creating technology under the guise of, or in response to (real or imaginary) a UFO threat. If we do not have proof, how do we convince people that this happening?
2. Do you ever think that you are unwittingly contributing to a myth by what you are proposing here? It is so hard to separate out what is real and not real. Sometimes it seems overwhelming.
3. As far as I can remember, you never did summarize your exact eschatological opinion in the Naked Bible discussion on end times. Since you are bringing up Islam here as a being susceptible to alien myths, and are perhaps anticipating a dangerous threat because of that susceptibility, do you see this situation as part of the beginning of the end? You may want to address this last question under the Naked Bible, but I really want to know your thoughts on this.
I will be anxious to see what this “new” group is…there is so much new age “stuff” that surrounds this whole issue, and I haven’t seen anyone capitalize on that issue just yet, but I feel certain that that has to be a part of this whole issue….
@aeneas: Actually, the “no proof” comment isn’t the case. Nick Redfern triangulates some evidence for this. Nick also mentioned at Roswell that there are two books coming out on the PAPERCLIP angle of Roswell in the upcoming year (so I hear from Roswell festival organizers and attendees).
I’ve not had a chance to look into Redfern’s book, although I certainly know about it. I think I’m frustrated because for years I’ve heard lots of stories about Roswell, with lots of “proof” behind them, but it never leads to anything definitive. I want to know what happened, and I want some answers about everything that is going on with the UFO phenomena. However, everything seems to come down to what this researcher says or that researcher says. I would like to spend more time researching into all of it myself, but I can’t find the time to do it. I think this is the same frustration that Catherine B voiced in an earlier post.
So we have to trust the “experts” in the field of UFO research and that means we have to know their ideology; however, even that is problematic. They could be liars or loons or good people who are just wrong. But how can we know for sure? You and I share the same faith, but I don’t really know exactly where you are coming from. That’s why I asked about your eschatological opinions. Because if we are careening to a literal end-times event, then what’s the point of all this discussion? There isn’t anything we can do to stop it—nor should we since it is what God has decreed. If we’re not going to have a literal end-times, but instead the truth is more nuanced—maybe some sort of preterism or partial-preterism—then we as believers can be, and should be, more proactive in stopping what is going on. And yet, how can we stop it if we don’t know what we are dealing with? Are there aliens who abduct people? Or are they spiritual beings? Or are they simply dreams? Or dreams manipulated by spiritual beings? Are there UFO’s? Or are they, again, spiritual beings? Or are they experimental aircraft? Or both? Who’s telling the truth? Who’s not? How can we make malevolent beings stop what they are doing? How can we make military or secret govt. organizations stop what they are doing? I don’t know about you but I’ve had belly full of the secrecy and unknowns, and I can’t just sit by and allow innocent people to be hurt or duped. Nor can I sit by while our freedoms are taken away by anybody—governmental or supernatural.
I’m sorry for the rant, but I truly am frustrated at this point.
@aeneas: Lots of items in all this. I’ll try and answer them, though that’s a lot of space for a reply!
First, on the nazi connections to Roswell (experimental craft, connected with well known Paperclip persona like Wernher von Braun), there is evidence for this. Go to the links below, in order. The first shows a memo that clearly describes the kind of experimental craft Redfern references in his book. The second is the cover page that testifies to the Horten brothers (who designed the nazi wingless aircraftm the Ho series) working for the US government – and note the date – BEFORE the Roswell event – then note the airfield on the memo – Wright-Patterson, where the Roswell wreckage was taken by ALL accounts.
http://www.michaelsheiser.com/roswell%20operation_paperclip.htm
http://www.michaelsheiser.com/1946%20report%20cover.pdf
Now for your questions (in quotes):
1. “I don’t really know exactly where you are coming from. That’s why I asked about your eschatological opinions. Because if we are careening to a literal end-times event, then what’s the point of all this discussion?”
MSH: I don’t think we are on the verge of end times fulfillment, nor do I think biblical prophecy ought to be interpreted in light of the UFO issue. I do believe, though, that they are connected (but not in terms of one being a hermeneutic for the other). I can’t detail my eschatological views in a reply. But something better for you would be to check out my post on my other blog, The Naked Bible, where I give a list of questions and “presuppositional reality checks” to anyone who thinks they have prophecy “down.” Anyone who sounds sure about prophetic interpretation is someone to ignore, or get away from. Here’s the link:
http://michaelsheiser.com/TheNakedBible/2008/06/end-times-questions-for-left-behinders-part-2-how-everyone-cheats-on-eschatology/
2. “There isn’t anything we can do to stop it—nor should we since it is what God has decreed.”
MSH: well, that depends on your presuppositions about foreknowledge and predestination. See the Naked Bible blog on that – I spent a couple weeks on this. Hint: it is not difficult to show (biblically) that foreknowledge of an event does NOT necessitate its predestination.
3. “If we’re not going to have a literal end-times, but instead the truth is more nuanced—maybe some sort of preterism or partial-preterism—then we as believers can be, and should be, more proactive in stopping what is going on. And yet, how can we stop it if we don’t know what we are dealing with?”
MSH: see the above
4. “Are there aliens who abduct people? Or are they spiritual beings? Or are they simply dreams? Or dreams manipulated by spiritual beings? Are there UFO’s? Or are they, again, spiritual beings? Or are they experimental aircraft? Or both? Who’s telling the truth? Who’s not?”
MSH: The answer is “yes” – The UFO/ET phenomenon is all these things and others. There is no one answer.
5. How can we make malevolent beings stop what they are doing? How can we make military or secret govt. organizations stop what they are doing? I don’t know about you but I’ve had belly full of the secrecy and unknowns, and I can’t just sit by and allow innocent people to be hurt or duped. Nor can I sit by while our freedoms are taken away by anybody—governmental or supernatural.”
MSH: Your questions reflect a low view of providence. On one hand, we can’t do anything directly to END these things. We can, though, do what’s right where we are and trust the providence of God. Who left it up to you? (or me, or us?) God will have his way with evil; he isn’t dependent on us for that. If you aren’t satisfied with that being God’s job description, you need to take that up with him.
Thanks for the feedback. I will be studying those links carefully. I was having a bad week when I sent that message; I’ll keep future comments shorter and more on topic. The last comment you made about taking it up with God is probably the best advice of all.
I looked at the Roswell link from your last comment and had a couple of questions: Where did you get the FBI Dallas document and the Von Braun one? Have they been authenticated? And second, where did you get the photograph of the UFO and balloon? That’s a powerful picture, but you only indicate that it came from a later time period.
@aeneas: I got them from one of the (several) UFO document repositories on the web. Can’t recall specifically if it was John Greenewald’s Black Vault or not, but his is the best resource. There are piles of pictures on the web for manmade UFOs, but you have to know the model name to get to the good ones. This one was taken in the sixties, and it is a dead ringer for what Redfern describes in his book for earlier periods (and for that memo, which is dated just after the Roswell incident).