100 of you took my “what’s the next topic” survey — I guess that’s a pounding. The Genesis and creation topic won big time. We’ll go there next in a few weeks (have to finish with eschatology). Here are the results:
Are there really that many readers? I thought we were about 30 or less. Well with your exposure at Church, Logos, Coast to Coast AM and Ancient of Days, I shouldn’t be surprised. Only several of us post comments.
MSH
on July 23, 2010 at 9:45 am
You apparently didn’t see my post on the six months stats for this blog that I posted shortly after July 1. Quite a lot of traffic.
terry the censor
on July 22, 2010 at 8:13 pm
I think the Septuagint is a better topic because its difference from the MT are less well-known to the general public. I think fundamentalist inerrancy arguments take a fatal pounding at the hands of the LXX.
MSH
on July 22, 2010 at 10:58 pm
you need to read my series of posts on inerrancy. It all depends on definitions and presumptions about what those terms mean (or ought to mean, or have to mean — and there is WIDE disagreement there).
Are there really that many readers? I thought we were about 30 or less. Well with your exposure at Church, Logos, Coast to Coast AM and Ancient of Days, I shouldn’t be surprised. Only several of us post comments.
You apparently didn’t see my post on the six months stats for this blog that I posted shortly after July 1. Quite a lot of traffic.
I think the Septuagint is a better topic because its difference from the MT are less well-known to the general public. I think fundamentalist inerrancy arguments take a fatal pounding at the hands of the LXX.
you need to read my series of posts on inerrancy. It all depends on definitions and presumptions about what those terms mean (or ought to mean, or have to mean — and there is WIDE disagreement there).